To get this all started: I had heard of Michelle Obama’s dinner cruise coinciding with the burning of the cathedral, but was not certain it would be possible to pin it down on her. As it turns out, it was possible to. Other people had already posted on this topic, but the work was done in a way that could be questioned as to how legit it was. So I set out to see if there was a way to actually pin it down, and there was a way. There is no doubt the elite New World Order crowd burned Notre Dame and celebrated, I have this sewn up in a body bag. Let’s get started.
First of all, let’s briefly cite the official story on Michelle Obama’s cruise, and then let’s put things in actual order and show what really happened. Here’s the official story:
“Michelle Obama was spotted on an idyllic dinner cruise in Paris on Monday night when she and the other guests learned that the nearby Notre Dame Cathedral had gone up in flames
The mood of passengers changed when news of the fire at Notre Dame filtered through. At one point during the cruise, Mrs Obama stared intently at a fellow passenger’s phone
OK, SO NOW I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, AND IT IS ALL RECORDED IN THE WINE GLASSES. THIS IS NOT DEPENDENT ON THE “QUESTIONABLE” MICHELLE OBAMA WINE GLASS PHOTO YOU MIGHT HAVE ALREADY SEEN
The cruise departed AFTER the cathedral was already hurling smoke into the sky. This is proven by the reflections in the wine glass in this photo which shows a rather happy Michelle Obama. You can’t see the actual cathedral in this photo yet because the dinner cruise is not close enough yet.
A little later in the cruise, we still have a very happy Michelle Obama, with the smoke from the burning cathedral still in her wine glass:
In this next photo (below), they are close to the burning cathedral, it is OBVIOUS WHAT THIS IS, and you can see the burning cathedral clearly reflected in Michelle’s wine glass. Other sites that found this only showed Michelle, and did not give the context which put all of this in doubt because after all, that photo could have been pasted onto that wine glass with a little photoshop. PROBLEM: This actually is an original photo that appeared in original form in THIS NEWS REPORTwhich proves it was not photoshop, that’s an actual photo in original form.
LOOK AT THE PEOPLE ON THIS YACHT. THEY ARE NOT SAD AT ALL THAT THE CATHEDRAL IS BURNING, AND THE LOOK ON MICHELLE’S FACE IS ONE OF VINDICATION. SHE’S NOT SAD, SHE’S VENGEFULLY SATISFIED. THIS CINCHES IT – THE CRUISE WAS DONE TO WATCH THE CATHEDRAL BURN. THE PEOPLE ON THE BOAT SET THIS UP.
And here is what Michelle was looking at, that was reflected in her wine glass:
All the news reports said Michelle did not get close enough to see the cathedral this way. I CALL BULLSHIT, the wine glass DID NOT LIE.
Why would they get close enough to witness it like this? It is called a “victory tour”.
IMPORTANT: The news report does not quote what is shown in the pictures in order or accurately at all, the photo where they are right up to the burning cathedral with it clearly showing in her wine glass is supposed to be from before she knew it was burning according to the reports, obviously because that chinese girl is very happy in the background and whoever wrote the report can’t look at a damn wine glass and was too stupid to know they wanted this.
They are playing the “not let the site update” game again
As usual, this site is updated several times daily. If it gets stale, delete your cache or open a new private window, then reload. That still works. But they’ll “fix that” I am sure.
BURNING OF NOTRE DAME MOSTLY A FAILURE THAT DID NOT ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVE
I have gone over the photos and will put it briefly: The roof that burned was not the roof that everyone saw when they went into the cathedral. Under the roof that burned was a second roof that was not flammable. The only part of the second roof that failed was where the spire fell through. When the spire fell, the firefighters were already gunning water into the place, so virtually no smoke damage or other damage happened. The remainder of the second roof under the one that burned for the most part did not fail, and remains in place. This is why the cathedral appears to be so unscathed on the interior, because it never experienced the fire.
LUCIFERIAN CHILD RAPING FRAZZLEDRIP SLAVE TRADING ORGAN HARVESTING HATE AMERICA NEW WORLD ORDER CELEBRATION CRUISE FAIL.
As it turns out, the fire department chaplain went in and saved the crown of thorns and one other priceless artifact, but if he had not, they would not have been hurt anyway, the cathedral held up THAT WELL. Adding insult to injury for the satanists, the spire that collapsed had a large number of beautiful statues on it that were removed with a crane on April 12, before they set the fire. So when it collapsed, even those were not lost, it was just an empty wooden structure that was going to be renovated anyway.
Not rumor: Michelle Obama was on a yacht with a bunch of other “elites” in the Seine river in sight of Notre Dame burning
Supposedly it is just “coincidence” and (she) is all sad. Oh well I guess, things are starting to stitch together here.NOT “MUSLIMS”.
I did not want to link this because the Daily Fail goes to great lengths to state how “sad” (she) was and that kind of lie turns my gut but figure the odds. What are the odds that this Cretin&Co of elites just happened to be cruising on the river as the cathedral burned? FIGURE THE ODDS.
SLAM DUNK: WHAT DID I SAY OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN? THE OLD RUSSIA NEVER DIED, IT JUST PLAYED DEAD
HERE IS PROOF: Headline: Stalin’s Approval Rating Among Russians Hits Record High of 70%
From the Moscow Times:“A record 70 percent of Russians approve of Soviet leader Josef Stalin’s role in Russian history, according to a poll published by the independent Levada Center pollster on Tuesday.
Stalin’s image has been gradually rehabilitated in the 2000s from that of a bloody autocrat to an “outstanding leader.”President Vladimir Putin has revived the Soviet anthem, Soviet-style military parades and a Soviet-era medal for labor during his presidency.
Seventy percent of Russian respondents told the Levada Center in 2019 that Stalin played a positive role for Russia. Stalin’s previous record approval rating stood at 54 percent in 2016.
A record low of 19 percent viewed Stalin’s role negatively, down from 32 percent in 2016.
“Stalin begins to be perceived as a symbol of justice and an alternative to the current government, deemed unfair, cruel and not caring about people, ” Academy of Sciences sociologist Leonty Byzov was quoted as saying by the RBC news website.”
MY COMMENT: TOLD YOU SO, FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS. Now read it in the Moscow Times. 70 percent approval is mind blowing, and if it is the result of “gradual rehabilitation” for the last 3 decades as the article states, the old Russia never died and spent the last 30 years regaining control of the minds of the Russian people.
I was the ONLY ONE SAYING IT. I know of no other. And I stood my ground and WAS RIGHT.
Putin is KGB. What else would you expect KGB to do, other than try to bring the old order back? And he’s probably not even the original Putin, as I have also said before. If 70 percent of the public views Stalin favorably, Russia is going to go right down the ol’ shitteree. Yep, RT can be accurate on American issues and still slam Russia into the gutter. They can gain favors with the American people by saying the obvious, while they obfuscate and slam their own wrongdoings into obscurity, JUST LIKE AMERICAN MEDIA DOES TO AMERICA.
HEADS UP: RED DAWN IS BACK ON THE RADAR.