In this article we will present perhaps some of the toughest questions anti-Whites can throw at you. Questions that would put many people on a defensive position if they are not prepared for it. This is how you tackle it and turn them into your favor by owning the moral high ground with your comebacks.
There is no perfect answer for every situation, and there is of course not a single answer to a question, as there are many ways you can answer a question. But in some cases you need some good comebacks if tough questions or statements are thrown at you on the spot when discussing or debating about the issues of immigration with other people.
What is important to have in mind when someone ask you questions like this is to think “What is his/her intention by asking me this?”. Know that only anti-Whites who wants to justify non-stop immigration into all and only White countries (a.k.a. White genocide) will ask you these questions, and their intention is to put you on the spot. They are trying to take the moral high ground and make you defensive and excuse yourself. This is all part of their anti-White mindset.
By knowing their intention it will become much easier for you to approachthis issue and recognize that they are simply anti-White, and it will enable you to point out their contradictions, which in turn will allow you to own the moral high ground in any situation.
Q 1. “Are you a racist?”
A 1. What’s a “racist”? Do you mean that all White people who do not want to become minority is a racist?
A 2. If a black man did not want to become a minority in an African country he would not be called a racist or a nazi. I am only asked this question because I am White. “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-White.
A 3. You are only asking me that because I am White. “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-White.
As pointed out above. Anti-Whites would only ever ask this question to a White person. You never hear them accuse or ask Japanese people if they are racist nazis for not wanting Japan to become non-Japanese, or a Mexican for not wanting Mexico to become non-Mexican and so on.
Would they accuse a Native American Indian of being racist if he did not like that Indians became a minority? No. Why? Because “anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-White.
Q 2. “What is your position on the Holocaust”?
A 1. One genocide does not justify another.
A 2. If by Holocaust you mean killing people, then of course no person would agree with that. I also think that one genocide does not justify another. Or are you suggesting that my people deserve to become a minority because of deeds done in the past?
Although anti-Whites claim to be free of prejudice, they seem to believe that all people who do not want Whites to become a minority in their own countries are nazis because the nazis cared about race. And because of their prejudice they believe they are talking to a “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” and therefore they think Holocaust is a relevant question.
But we all know that the Holocaust has nothing to do with the current immigration policies. We know that they are anti-White and they are just trying to put you on the spot.
Q 3. “You mention White genocide. But Whites are not systematically killed?”
A 1. No matter how you try to do away with a group of people it is genocide. It does not have to be violent. If Jews were done away with in a non-violent way it would still be genocide.
A 2. As the UN convention on genocide will tell you, it does not need to be violent. No matter how you try to do away with a group of people it is genocide.
Anti-Whites fiercely oppose that what they are doing is genocide. They try to picture it as something beautiful. A melting pot of blended colors. They will come up with all kinds of reasons why doing away with White people is not genocide. Our job is to keep pointing out that no matter how you try to do away with a group of people it is genocide.
Q 4. “Define White people/White country. What do you mean by that?”
A 1. You have no problem knowing who is White when you talk about slavery, colonization, discrimination or racism. But if someone who does not agree that we should become a minority in our own countries confronts you, you suddenly pretend to have problems to identify who is White.
A 2. A White country is a country that MUST have multiculturalism and non-stop immigration. In other words, a White majority country.
Anti-Whites LOVE to tell you to define this, that and the other. DO NOT fall into this trap. The fact is that everybody knows who is White or not. The reason anti-Whites deny our existence in this context is because they are subconsciously justifying White genocide. Since they can clearly identify Whites in other (negative) contexts, it is clear for us that they know who is White. The same applies to White countries, they know that we are not talking about Asia or Africa when we mention White countries, they know we are referring to the Western world and countries with a majority White population. Again, do not fall for that trap.
Q 5. “Why are you against immigration and diversity?”
A 1. Because I don’t agree that my people should become a minority in our own countries. Immigration and diversity means less White people.
A 2. Diversity means there is too many White people. No non-White country or area ever needs more diversity. They are already diverse enough.
A 3. We can have racial diversity in a global context. Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans and White countries for White people. But that is not the kind of diversity you want. You want every (White) country to become a indistinguisable “meltingpot”.
We know why the anti-Whites ask us this. Their intention is to try to portray us as evil. But in reality most people are not against immigration or diversity per sé. It’s not like Norwegian people have much of an issue if some Swedes decide to move there, or if some German people move to Spain. I don’t think most people have any problems with that. I don’t think most people have any problems with non-Whites visiting their country as tourists either.
What people DO have a problem with is that we have anti-White people with an intention to do away with us. Most people do not want to see their people becoming a minority or their country being transformed beyond recognition. Only sick people think genocide is a good thing.
Q 6. “Do you want to kick the immigrants out? Back to war and poverty?”
A 1. It is not inhumane for Pakistanis to live Pakistan, it is not inhumane for Chinese to live in China and it is not inhumane for Turks to live in Turkey. And it is not war and poverty in all of Africa.
A 2. By suggesting that immigrants are going back to war and poverty you are demonizing the whole Third World, which is very prejudicial. There are many good places to live in that is not predominantly White.
A 3. It is not war in all of Africa. And besides, nobody is actually “kicked out”. They came with boats and planes and they can return with boats and planes.
A 4. If the return of immigrants is what is needed to stop White genocide. It is not inhumane for Chinese to be reintegrated in China or Turks to be reintegrated in Turkey.
Many people have a strange conception or association that whenever someone talks about making our countries homogeneous again, they think that people have to suffer. That we have to “kick them out”, by dragging them by their hair and put them on a train to gas chambers or a war zone. They do not believe that there are any peaceful and humane solutions to these issues, or rather they take that for granted and have never really thought much about such possibilities.
There you have it, some of the toughest questions asked by anti-Whites you now know how to deal with if they come your way!
What does all these questions have in common? They all try to justify a world without White people. This is always the anti-White intention. Whether it is conscious or subconscious, it is an expression of their anti-White mindset.